|
Canada-based
Indian filmmaker Deepa Mehta's visually stunning "Water" is in fierce
Oscar competition for the best foreign film against Mexican director
Guillermo del Toro's fantasy flight "Pan's Labyrinth".
"There
is fierce competition between 'Water' and 'Pan's Labyrinth'. The
Canadian and Mexican films are battling it out for the Oscar Academy
award," an Academy member told www.hollywood.tv.
The question is not if but how "Water" will win.
"Water" ranked sixth of the overall top-grossing 15 foreign language films in 2006, making $3.3 million.
When
"Water" first opened in April 2006, it played in only five US theatres.
By October, it was in 91 theatres. "Pan's Labyrinth" ("El Laberinto del
Fauno") by contrast, opened in 17 theatres just before new year and,
according to Reuter's, has already raked in $40 million.
But
when it comes to winning an Oscar, these statistics are of little
consequence. In the end, deciding which film wins comes down to the
voting members.
But just to get a nomination, the distributors
wage an aggressive ad campaign months in advance. Picturehouse, which
was formed two years ago by New Line Cinema and HBO Films, upped the
ante this year, giving "Pan's Labyrinth" a better chance of winning an
Oscar by having it nominated for screenplay, art direction,
cinematography, original score and makeup.
On the other hand,
other than campaigning for best foreign film, Fox Searchlight has done
little to promote "Water" in any other category, let alone for an Oscar
in cinematography, given the exceptional camera work by Giles Nuttgens,
who also shot Mehta's other two films - "Earth" and Fire".
So
if "Water" doesn't win the Oscar for best foreign film, it will have no
other opportunity to play up its other strengths. A loss for "Water"
would be an even greater shame as many of Hollywood's elite filmmakers
are quite impressed with it.
Legendary actor and multiple
Academy award winner Clint Eastwood said: "Cinematically, India
produces some of the best films in the world. I am very impressed with
the colours, music and cinematography. It's only a matter of time
before the Indian film industry goes international and is on par with
Hollywood."
US producer Jerry Bruckheimer said: "Indian movie
producers need to make their products more international-oriented so
that they appeal to people of all backgrounds and genres worldwide.
Once they take this action, the Indian film industry will attract a
global international cinema audience."
"Additionally, Indian
movie producers must increase their print and advertising budget," said
Bruckheimer, whose credits include "Pirates of the Caribbean", "Black
Hawk Down" and "Pearl Harbor".
He added: "The only way for them
to do this would be by raising substantially more monies for marketing.
The reason why it is so expensive to produce movies in Hollywood today
is because of the exorbitant marketing budgets associated with the
movies."
It's interesting that India, which allowed its
rightwing extremists to hound Mehta out of the country by torching her
sets and burning her effigies, forcing her to film it in Sri Lanka, is
now brimming with pride that an Indian film is up for Oscar
consideration.
But "Water" is a Canadian entry and its first
foreign film nomination since winning the Oscar for "The Barbarian
Invasions" in 2003. If the film wins, Canada will be celebrating.
India, on the other hand, will have to settle for a vicarious victory.
Twice
before, in 2001 with "Lagaan" and again in 2005 with "Paheli", the
Indian distributors SET India and Eros, respectively, revelled in the
fact that their films had been nominated, but did little to promote
them.
Financially, their box office numbers were abysmal.
"Lagaan" played in 34 theatres for less than a month and made under $1
million. "Paheli" played in 68 theatres for less than a month as well
and reaped only $1.4 million in revenue. The nominations were simply
treated as an icing on the cake and regarded as nothing more.
The
Indian distributors fail miserably in the area of marketing. Outside
Middle Eastern countries and the NRI market, Indian films do not have
much export value.
Because of the success of such films as
"Moulin Rouge", which borrowed heavily from the cinematic extravagance
of Bollywood, or the "Bourne Supremacy", which used Goa as an exotic
locale, India and Hollywood seem to be on the brink of participating in
a highly lucrative filmmaking partnership.
But Indian directors,
producers and distributors have to make the first move. They need to
set up shop in Hollywood and not only fund those films that would
appeal to the international market, but also be willing to spend their
own money on the advertising and promotion necessary to make a film a
success and not rely on Hollywood studios.
By Sheeraz Hasan, Indo-Asian News Service
|